Water quality agreement should be scrapped -- report.(State)

"Water quality agreement should be scrapped -- report. " The Grand Rapids Press (Grand Rapids, MI).  (Oct 25, 2006): B6. Grand Rapids Press. Gale. Kent District Library. 27 Aug. 2008 
<http://find.galegroup.com/itx/infomark.do?&contentSet=IAC-Documents&type=retrieve&tabID=T004&prodId=SPN.SP01&docId=CJ153416286&source=gale&srcprod=SP01&userGroupName=lom_kentdl&version=1.0>.


Full Text:COPYRIGHT 2006 All rights reserved. Reproduced with the permission of The Grand Rapids Press by the Gale Group, Inc.

Byline: John flesher / the associated press

TRAVERSE CITY -- A U.S.-Canadian pact to clean up the Great Lakes has run its course after more than three decades and should be scrapped in favor of a more effective, modern strategy, a binational panel said Wednesday.

The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972 has inspired progress on some of the ecosystem's biggest threats, such as untreated sewage and industrial toxic discharges, said a report by the International Joint Commission, which advises both countries about the lakes.

Yet the agreement's success stories are offset by lingering problems, such as unfinished cleanup of highly contaminated harbors and rivers, the report said.

The agreement, which has not been updated since 1987, is cumbersome and lacks tools for prodding government to take action, the report said. And it overlooks emerging issues such as invasive species, habitat loss, climate change and urban sprawl.

"Threats to water quality persist, new ones have emerged and scientific advances have yielded new understandings of problems that, in turn, point to different solutions," the report said. "What was once judged farsighted and robust enough to protect vulnerable populations of humans, fish and wildlife is no longer sufficient."

Instead of updating the agreement yet again, the commission called for a new plan. It should identify ambitious goals, set timelines and yardsticks for progress, hold governments accountable and adapt quickly to changing circumstances, the report said.

"If you look at the agreement now, there are lots of objectives and they're worthwhile, but they're not linked with deadlines," said Herb Gray, the Canadian co-chairman of the commission.

"We're just saying there's more that has to be done, and it has to be done in an up-to-date manner."

The new agreement should take a more holistic approach to Great Lakes protection by focusing on the biological integrity of entire watersheds and ecosystems and making human health a top priority, the report said.

The original water quality agreement was signed by President Nixon and Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. It established a framework for international cooperation on restoring the health of the Great Lakes, which make up about 20 percent of the world's surface fresh water.

Gale Document Number:CJ153416286